![]() ![]() Stanley Martin Companies, LLC, the purchasers of a single-family home in Charles County filed suit alleging that the seller improperly imposed an amortized water and sewer charge for a period of thirty years after the date of the initial sale. Maryland and Virginia appellate courts issue decisions on statutory interpretation SunTrust Bank Company, the Court held that a public easement, such as the disputed open plaza being used by vendors for a farmers’ market. The District of Columbia Court of Appeals has clarified a pair of rulings from 18 as to how public easements may be accepted. Read Moreĭistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals clarifies public easement rules James Webb, the Court examined the issue of whether prescriptive rights could arise from a pre-1976 grant of permission by the servient estate which was never expressly. The Supreme Court of Virginia has reversed a trial court and upheld a prescriptive easement where the issue of permission was hotly contested. The Supreme Court of Virginia has reversed a trial court and upheld a prescriptive easement where the issue of permission was hotly contested in Kevin Horn v. Traverse lands not owned by the servient estate and how the conveyed rights, if any, may be terminated. Palace, LLC, the Court examined an express easement which included purported rights to May be terminated by estoppel and adverse possession. The Appellate Court of Maryland has confirmed that an “easement to nowhere,” if it existed, Aiken, the Supreme Court of Maryland has clarified how public roads are established, recognizing that its prior case law “has caused confusion.” The Court agreed with the Appellate Court of Maryland’s “well-reasoned analysis and affirm its judgment in all respects.” The Appellate Court’s decision was discussed here in August, 2022.Īppellate Court of Maryland confirms an "easement to nowhere" is terminated. ![]() ![]() Supreme Court of Maryland has clarified how public roads are established Burger (2015) - Ethics and Professional Responsibility Law is pleased to announce a number of our Directors have been named to The Best Lawyers in America© 2024 Edition.Īrthur D. Turnaround Esm’t” failed to satisfy the Virginia Code requirements to create. Christopher Customs, LLC, the Court held that language stating, “24’ Ingress-Egress Esm’t” and “35’ Rad. The Court of Appeals of Virginia affirmed a summary judgment grant finding that language included in a subdivision plat did not create a public easement. He is admitted to the United States Supreme Court.Ĭhris attended Pace University School of Law and served on the staff of the “Environmental Law Review.” He graduated with a Bachelor of Arts from the University of Maryland in 1995.Ĭourt of Appeals of Virginia holds private easement not a public dedication. He is admitted to practice in, and has appeared before, the United States Circuit Courts for the Fourth Circuit, District of Columbia Circuit and the Federal Circuit and the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims. Chris has an active pro bono practice in which he focuses on assisting active members of the armed forces and disabled veterans.Ĭhris is an active member of the bars of the Commonwealth of Virginia, State of Maryland and District of Columbia as well as the United States District Courts for the Eastern and Western Districts of Virginia, the District of Maryland and the District of Columbia. Since 2009, he has served on the Fairfax County Industrial Development Authority. Chris presently serves on the Regulations/Rules/Board Procedures Committee of the District of Columbia Bar, having recently served as the Chair of the Judicial Evaluation Committee. ![]() As an experienced problem-solver for his clients, Chris identifies areas of potential liability and helps manage his client’s exposure to risks and to improve their business.Ĭhris is a frequent lecturer, most recently teaching a multi-day course on Law and Risk Management for a regional real estate developer with a portfolio in excess of $1.5B. He concentrates his litigation practice on complex commercial and business disputes and real estate/construction matters. and serves as Chair of the Firm’s General Litigation and Trial Practice Group and member of the Firm’s Real Estate Practice Group.Ĭhris represents closely held companies and small business owners in a cross-section of industries in an array of disputes in the federal and state courts in the Washington Metropolitan Area. Glaser is a Director at Jackson & Campbell, P.C. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |